Whither Refugees? Restrictionism, Crises and Precarity Writ Large
Never since the Second World War have refugees faced such life and death alternatives with nowhere to turn, and faced with increased restrictionisms. The case of Greece epitomizes these new global phenomena, which have been analogous to what the poorest parts of the global south have been experiencing for decades and of what may lie ahead. Holding the 17th IASFM conference in Thessaloniki makes it possible to reflect on the variety of predicaments of refugees in the 21st century; the convergence of longer and fragmented routes and multiple modes of travel; the impact of economies of austerities on refugee lives; and the emergence of new responses to these crises.
The aim of this conference is to address the changes in global refugee movements, responses and debates and to place them in historical perspectives. Given the current world situation, it is necessary to bring refugees squarely back into academic, policy, non-governmental and citizen debates and praxis.
3. Civil society, new humanitarianism and citizens’ mobilization
Classic forms of humanitarianism are becoming obsolete. New forms of citizen mobilization and engagement are emerging; roles are being reversed; the militarization and privatisation of aid are widespread; and we see the consolidation of refugee and migrants’ led activism and citizens’ solidarity with asylum seekers and refugees. Such 3 issues need to be addressed through dialogues among social actors working in different sectors.
4. Politics of representation and changing identities
The proliferation and widespread dissemination of images of refugees and migrants, of crises and new emergencies in media and especially social media, contribute to a restructuring of the political landscape, including the reconceptualization of the threatening refugee and Islamophobia, from refugee as resources to refugee entrepreneurs within a global neo-liberalism context, and powerless vulnerable victims in need of aid. Panels will address the politics of representation in historical, cultural, aesthetic perspectives.
5. Reflective praxis
In a world of the ‘big data’, this theme will revisit the ways in which information is being used by practitioners for promoting accurate information to refugees concerning ‘Who is a refugee’ , how refugees themselves manage the increasing complex bureaucratic structures and information services around them and how to make a claims when they have no lawyer or assistance. It will examine the role of trainings, legal aid, and education provisions for refugees. We will also address the comparison between refugees and development induced forced displacement. To what extend are the experiences of these forced migrants and other ‘internally displaced’ populations similar or different from each other?
RULES OF PARTICIPATION
Conference participants may only make one paper presentation. In addition to a paper presentation, they may also play a second role: organise/chair a panel and/or roundtable or be a discussant on a panel or roundtable.
PAPER PANELS, FILMS, ART PROJECTS, COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH – PRACTITIONER PROJECTS The Program Committee will give preference to panel proposals and other artistic interventions over individual papers. Panels organized on the basis of any of the proposed themes will ensure cohesive discussions throughout the conference. The Committee particularly encourages imaginative panels that incorporate comparative perspectives, cross-disciplinary boundaries, and engage debates between scholars and practitioners and when possible forced migrants. We will limit panels to a maximum of two consecutive ninety-minute sessions, each of which can hold a maximum of four papers or other equivalent. Presentations should last between 15-20 minutes allowing for discussion and questions from the audience.
For more information please click "Further Official Information" below.